|
Dr ES Williams
Introduction
A pro-choice dogma now dominates sex
education and abortion counselling. Virtually all sex education programmes are
built around the concept of the ‘informed choice’. While the language may vary,
with phrases such as ‘informed decision’, ‘health choices’, ‘responsible
decisions’ and so on, the underlying meaning is the same—a young woman is
provided with information to enable her to make a choice between the various
sexual options that are open to her. Pro-choice abortion counselling, for
example, invites a woman to make an informed choice between three
options, parenting, adoption and abortion. According to the British Pregnancy
Advisory Service, ‘Our current policy is one of adapting to each individual by
the provision of information, the provision of support, clarifying that every
woman understands all options open to her. This will enable a woman to be
respected in her decision and make an informed choice.’[i]
Task Force on Informed Choice
The term informed choice
first appeared in family planning literature in the early 1970s, and became
prominent in family planning policy when USAID stated that its support for
family planning programmes was based the two principles of voluntarism and
informed choice.[ii]
In 1987, the Task Force on Informed Choice, which consisted of representatives
from 17 organisations actively involved in promoting family planning, including
the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), met to develop guidance
on how informed choice should be used in family planning programmes.[iii]
In 1994, the International Conference on Population and Development (Cairo)
agreed that informed choice in family planning is based on human rights.
During the last decade the concept of informed choice has become an
integral part of virtually all family planning, abortion counselling and sex
education programmes worldwide.
The Task Force defined
informed choice as ‘effective access to information on reproductive choices
and to the necessary counselling, services and supplies to help individuals
choose and use an appropriate method of family planning, if desired.’[iv]
According to the Population Report ‘the purpose of informed choice is to
ensure that all clients decide for themselves on health care that best meets
their needs’.[v]
The Task Force claimed that ‘the goal of counselling is to have the client
arrive at a choice that he/she is satisfied with and, if the choice is to use
contraception, to prepare the client to use his/her chosen method effectively.’[vi]
It concluded that much progress had been made in promoting informed choice and
recommended that family planning agencies should develop a training module
specifically on informed choice.[vii]
‘Family planning and health care professionals need to understand that
implementation of programmes to promote informed choice will make their
job easier, not harder.’[viii]
The International Planned Parenthood Federation
The International Planned Parenthood Federation has
a deep commitment to the concept of informed choice. According to the
IPPF Annual Program Review: ‘The commitment of the IPPF towards empowering young
people to make informed decisions and choices regarding their sexual and
reproductive health has been solid and unwavering since the early 1990s.’[ix]
The underlying principle which guides the work of IPPF is a rights-based
approach, with International Human Rights treaties informing the way IPPF works
with the developmental context of young people… This approach enhances young
people’s development and reduces health risk behaviours, including unprotected
intercourse. The importance of youth empowerment, informed choice and
practices of non-discrimination has enabled the Federation to respond
effectively to the needs of young people, to protect and promote their right to
accurate, non-judgemental sexual and reproductive health information and
services…’[x]
The IPPF believes that young people ‘need accurate information about safer sex
and a broad range of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services.
They need personal skills and confidence to practise sexual behaviour that is
safe and enjoyable for them, and to negotiate the sexual relationship they want
at the time that is right for them.’[xi]
The IPPF policy on informed choice states
that all FPAs shall facilitate access to a broad range of sexual and
reproductive health services. An article in Population Reports (series J,
number 5) declares that ‘managing for informed choice requires commitment
by leadership and an environment designed to give clients what they want’.
[xii] The ultimate aim of the informed
choice is to enable people to choose what they want.[xiii]
In 2002 the IPPF called on the
United Nations Special Session of Children to stand by its previous commitments
to young people’s sexual rights. Dr Pramilla Senanyake of the IPPF said: ‘We
believe that with the tools to make informed choices, young men and women
can not only protect themselves from the risks of HIV, unwanted pregnancy and
unsafe abortion, they can also enjoy a better life with the freedom to achieve
their aspirations.’[xiv]
In its note to editors the IPPF claims to be at the forefront of the fight to
help young people protect themselves from unwanted pregnancies and HIV and make
informed decisions.[xv]
Secular sex education programmes
The dogma of informed choice is now
the common currency of virtually all sex education programmes in the UK. The
Sex Education Forum, an umbrella organisation for the main organisation involved
in sex education, claims in Framework for Sex and Relationships Education
that children and young people want to learn and practise personal skills which
will help them ‘to take responsibility for their own and other’s sexual health,
to access support and help and to make informed choices and decisions
regarding their sexual health and emotional well-being’.[xvi]
AVERT (an international HIV
and AIDS charity based in the UK, with the aim of AVERTing HIV and AIDS
worldwide) says that its sex education is about ‘developing young people’s
skills so that they make informed choices about their behaviour, and feel
confident and competent about acting on these choices’.[xvii]
The FPA declares that ‘if people are to enjoy positive sexual health, they need
knowledge and awareness from which to make informed choices, and the confidence
to express their sexuality.’[xviii]
Anne Weyman of the FPA says that high quality sex and relationships education,
begun early and well delivered by trained staff ‘remains of vital importance in
enabling young people to make informed choices about their sexual health’.[xix]
The Brook Advisory Centres, in its mission statement, says that it ‘exits to
enable all young people to make informed choices about their personal and
sexual relationships so that they can enjoy their sexuality without harm’.[xx]
Lovelife, South Africa’s national HIV
prevention programme for young people, developed by a consortium of
organisations including the Planned Parenthood Association of South Africa,
declares that the campaign ‘promotes specific behavioural values, including
informed choice and responsible behaviour sexuality, and links young people
to counselling and clinical services’.[xxi]
‘Christian’ sex education and informed choice
CARE, one of the most high profile
Christian organisations involved in sex education, is deeply committed to the
dogma of informed choice. It’s new sex education programme Evaluate…
informing choice ‘empowers young people to make healthy informed choices,
and supports them in delaying sexual experience until a committed relationship,
ideally marriage’.[xxii]
CARE’s sex education video Make Love Last helps young people come to a
balanced and sound decision about their sexual behaviour. ‘Young people have
the right and need to examine the major options on offer. Without this
opportunity they cannot make an informed choice.’[xxiii]
The Northern Ireland sex education
programme Love for Life, aims ‘to empower young people to respect and
value themselves and to support them in making informed healthy choices
in the area of relationships and sexuality’. Oasis Esteem, another Christian
organisation involved in sex education, ‘exists to empower and enable young
people to make informed choices about sex and relationships, drugs and
alcohol and health living through education and training services’.[xxiv]
Love for Life
encourages teenagers to make informed choices with regard to their sexual
conduct on the basis of factual information and positive self-esteem.[xxv]
Two options are set before children—to have sex or not to have sex. Because
this is seen as a difficult choice, sex education helps by providing teenagers
with the information they need to make an informed decision. In support
of the one option children are given information about the joys of sex, the
importance of being in a stable relationship and the ability to access
contraception. In support of the other option children are provided with
information about the failure rate of contraception and the incidence of STDs.
On the basis of the information provided, children are in a position to weigh up
the pros and cons, and then to make an informed decision about which
option appeals to them most.
Secular pro-choice abortion counselling
The idea of ‘informed choice’ is
central to abortion counselling. Pro-choice counselling invites a woman to make
an ‘informed choice’ between the three options, based on the information she has
received and guided by her feelings. BPAS states that its ‘current policy is
one of adapting to each individual by the provision of information, the
provision of support, clarifying that every woman understands all options open
to her. This will enable a woman to be respected in her decision and make an
informed choice.’[xxvi]
Planned Parenthood tells its clients that its counsellors ‘will provide
information to help women and couples make informed choices’.[xxvii]
Brook Advisory Centres believe that ‘it is every woman’s right to have access to
impartial information about abortion, as well as support in making an
informed decision about pregnancy.’ ‘Brook believes that young people should
be helped to make informed decisions that are right for them in the long
term.’[xxviii]
A Marie Stopes booklet on abortion has been designed to help a woman ‘reach an
informed decision’ about the options available to her.[xxix]
The Sexwise project, which consists of a website and radio programmes, has been
developed jointly by the International Planned Parenthood Federation and the BBC
World Service, to speak to people in different regions of the world about sexual
health and reproductive rights, which include the right to abortion. A key aim
of Sexwise is to assist people to make more informed choices about their
sexuality.[xxx]
CARE’s crisis pregnancy counselling
CARE’s 162 independent
pregnancy-counselling centres provide a classic example of the dogma of informed
choice as it relates to abortion. A pregnancy-counselling centre is a place
where a pregnant woman can talk with a trained advisor confidentially. CARE’s
pregnancy counsellors ‘are trained in non-directional counselling, enabling you
to discover more clearly how you feel about the situation you are in’.
According to CARE Centres Network website the objective of counselling is to
help a woman discover what she wants to do with her pregnancy. The website
explains that ‘a pregnancy counselling centre is a place where you can spend as
much time as you want to talk with a trained advisor confidentially. She will
listen to you, give you all the information you need, help you find out what you
want to do.’[xxxi]
And what are her options?
First, she may continue with the pregnancy, second, she may put her child out
for adoption and third, she may have an abortion. The woman is provided with
all the information she needs to make an informed choice between these three
options. CARE’s website stresses that ‘it is important for you to have all the
information so that you can decide for yourself… Abortion is not an easy thing
to do. You may feel that you need to talk to someone in more detail about your
situation before making a final decision.’ CARE’s leaflet Making a Decision
is designed to help pregnant women make an informed choice around their
options. The leaflet invites a pregnant woman to consider what she will lose
with each option. ‘Write a list of those things you think you might lose with
each of the options. These may include things like money, accommodation,
freedom…’ The woman is then invited to consider what she will she stands to
gain from each option. ‘This time go through the list and think of the things
you would gain with each of the options. How important are these gains to you?’
So a leading aim of CARE’s
counselling process is to guide a woman to a position where she is able to make
her own informed decision. According to CARE’s training manual for crisis
pregnancy counselling, Called to Care, ‘to achieve empathy we must
balance the ability to remain objective, so we can help the woman make an
informed choice whilst identifying with the woman’s perceptions and feelings.’[xxxii]
One of the main goals of counselling is to bring a woman ‘to the point where she
can make a fully informed decision’.[xxxiii]
CARE advisors are trained to give ‘accurate information about all the options
open to you so that you can make an informed choice’.[xxxiv]
CARE Centres Network advises a woman: ‘You are entitled to this information so
that you and your partner can make an informed choice.’[xxxv]
CARE confidential provides ‘confidential counselling to help you reach
your own informed choice’.[xxxvi]
Informed choice dogma
The basic presupposition of informed
choice dogma is that we live in a universe without moral absolutes. The
International Planned Parenthood Federation believes that the approach of those
who advocate sex education and abortion should always be to insist on free and
informed choice, and that it is always a mistake to enter into debates on
questions of morality.[xxxvii]
Because there is no absolute moral framework that governs sexual conduct, young
people can be presented with smorgasbord of sexual activities from which to
choose their behaviour. Once we grasp the presupposition on which the edifice
of informed choice is built, we are able to identify three essential
characteristics of informed choice dogma.
1. Sexual options
Informed choice dogma presents young
people with options around sexual behaviour from which they can choose how to
behave. Sex education offers young people the choice of delaying sexual
activity or practising ‘safer sex’. Young people are presented with two options
and invited to choose the one that makes them feel most comfortable, and
whatever choice they make is right for them. There is no warning that any form
of sexual behaviour is wrong. The effect is to demoralise sexual behaviour.
Informed choice propaganda encourages a young woman to believe that her
so-called informed decision to have sex is a morally neutral action—she is not
warned of the moral consequences.
2. Factual sex information
Informed choice dogma demands that
young people are given information about all the options, so that they are able
to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of each option before making their
choice. Before a young woman can decide whether or not to have sex she needs to
know all about the dangers imposed by sexually transmitted diseases, and how to
protect herself from these dangers. She needs to be fully informed about
contraception, and how to get access to contraceptive services, just in case she
chooses to have sex. What is significant is that the young woman is not told of
the moral and spiritual dangers associated with sexual immorality.
3. What ever she chooses is right for her
Informed choice dogma persuades a
young woman that whatever she choice she makes, whether it is to have ‘safer
sex’ or to abstain that it’s the right choice for her. The pamphlet Sexual
health matters for young women (HEA) explains that ‘whether or not you have
sex can be a difficult decision to make. But in the end it’s what’s right for
you, and only you can answer that. If you’ve decided you’re not ready for sex,
then fine. Remember, it’s your body, your choice and your right to say no.
Only have sex because you want to’.[xxxviii]
The young woman is offered a choice of whether or not to have sex, and her
decision depends on what she wants, on her sexual desires, on how she
feels at that moment in time, and not on any objective standard of right and
wrong. Notice that if she does not want to have sex, then fine, it is
her right to say no. The corollary is that if she does want to have sex
then fine, it is her right to say yes. The inference is that whatever she
chooses is right for her. All that matters is that she makes her own choice,
free from any moral considerations. She is persuaded to do what she believes to
be right in her own eyes.
So we see that informed choice
dogma sets before children the proposition that sexual promiscuity and sexual
abstinence are moral equivalents. Both options are open to a girl and the
choice she makes is not really important—as the HEA puts it: ‘If you’ve decided
you’re not ready for sex them fine.’[xxxix]
What is important is that a girl makes her own decision, not influenced by
anybody else, and especially not by the negative ‘thou-shalt-nots’ of the Bible
or the traditional views of her parents. A girl who chooses to ‘have sex’ is
described as having made a ‘responsible choice’ provided she uses
contraception. Sex education even offers to help those who want to ‘have sex’
by teaching them how to negotiate ‘safer sex’ with a partner. Those who choose
not to have sex are reassured that they can always change their mind when they
meet the right person or when they feel ready for sex. And if they become
pregnant, sex education offers the option of an abortion.
To offer children the option
of having sex without warning that promiscuity is against the moral law of God
is leading them into the path of temptation. To place before children the
choice of sexual intercourse, and suggest that it is for them to make an
informed decision on the basis of the facts, guided by how they feel, is
damnable advice. Those who do so should take heed of the biblical warning.
Jesus said, ‘Temptations to sin are sure to come, but woe to the one through
whom they come! It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his
neck and he were cast into the sea than that he should cause one of these little
ones to sin’ (Luke:1-2).
Christian responsibility
This examination of informed choice
dogma shows that it is fundamentally opposed to biblical morality. Christian
teaching about sexual conduct is completely different. The Bible makes it
abundantly clear that human sexual behaviour is subject to the moral law of
God. And God’s law demands sexual purity, decency and propriety, and declares
that fornication, adultery, homosexuality and bestiality are wrong. Jesus
warned that the broad way leads to destruction. The choice is between obeying
God's word or not. This is a moral choice.
Any attempt to teach about
sexual conduct in a moral vacuum is to promote amorality, which always leads to
sexual immorality. The God of the Bible demands that his people control their
bodies ‘in a way that is holy and honourable, not in passionate lust like the
heathen, who do not know God’ (1 Thessalonians 4:4-5). The New Testament warns
that we should ‘flee from sexual immorality’ (1 Corinthians 6:18).
Return to top of page
[i]
Psychology & reproductive choice, Abortion counselling: issues and
approaches by Gill Holden
[ii]
Family Planning Programs, Population Reports, Series J, Number 50,
volume XXIX, Number 1, Spring 2001, Population Information Programme,
The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Informed
Choice, Evolution of Informed Choice.
[iii]
Ibid. Population Reports, Series J, Number 50, Evolution of Informed
Choice
[iv]
Ibid. Task Force Executive Summary, p3
[v]
Ibid. Population Reports, Series J, Number 5, Evolution of Informed
Choice
[vi]
Ibid. Task Force Executive Summary, p4
[vii]
Ibid. Task Force Executive Summary, p5
[viii]
Ibid. Task Force Executive Summary, p6
[ix]
IPPF Annual Programme Review 2002-2003, Young people, p61
[xii]
Ibid. Population Reports, Series J, Number 5, Managing for Informed
Choice
[xiii]
Ibid. Population Reports, Series J, Number 5, Managing for Informed
Choice
[xiv]
IPPF website, Stand by your commitment to adolescents, IPPF urges, 1 May
2002
[xvi]
Sex Education Forum, The Framework for Sex and Relationship Education,
1999, p2
[xvii]
AVERT website, What is sex education,
[xviii]
Family Planning Association Manifesto for Sexual Health & Family
Planning, 1990
[xix]
BBC news online, 13 June 2002, Sex education ‘fails to cut pregnancies’
[xx]
Brook website, Brook’s mission statement, charitable object, and values
[xxi]
loveLife South Africa’s National HIV Prevention Programme for Young
People, p5
[xxii]
CARE, Education Policy, Aims & Code of Conduct.
[xxiii]
Make Love Last website, values statement.
[xxv]
Cited from, Love for Life website, www.loveforlife.org.uk
[xxvi]
Prochoiceforum website, Practice issues, Abortion counselling: issues
and approaches by Gill Holden, Deborah Russel and Catherine Paterson
[xxvii]
Ibid. Planned Parenthood Alberta website, The Option of Abortion
[xxviii]
Brook website, news 20th April 2002
[xxix]
Marie Stopes booklet, Abortion your questions answered
[xxx]
BBC World Service website, Global News and Comment, Sexwise, project
overview
[xxxi]
CARE Centres Network website, It’s positive – what are my options
[xxxii]
CARE, Called to Care, A manual for Christian Pregnancy Crisis
Counselling
[xxxiii]
CARE, Called to Care, Pregnancy counselling, p77
[xxxiv]
CARE Centres Network website, Making a decision
[xxxv]
CARE Centres Network website, Men and Crisis Pregnancy
[xxxvi]
CARE Confidential website, leaflet, More About CARE Confidential,
[xxxvii]
The Human Right to Family Planning, International Planned
Parenthood Federation, 1984, p32
[xxxviii]
Sexual matters for young women, Health Education Authority,
inside front cover
[xxxix]
Sexual health matters for young women, Health Education
Authority, inside front cover
|