Harm of divorce


Home page • Abortion • Sex Education • Cohabitation • Marriage • Divorce • Modesty • Contraception • Catalogue.pdf

 

 

Up

 

Harm of divorce • Reality of divorce • Why divorce is wrong

Divorce: Destructive associations

 Mortality, unemployment and sexual behaviour: Chapter 19, The Great Divorce Controversy

Many people agree that mortality figures provide a good proxy measure for health.  For this reason public health specialists use mortality rates to compare the relative health status of different groups within a population.  For example, mortality figures are routinely analysed by social class to describe differences between the groups.  It is well known that people in the more deprived social classes have mortality rates that are significantly higher than rates in the more affluent social classes.  An obvious strength of mortality data is that it is collected for all deaths, and therefore is routinely available in large numbers.

Divorce and mortality

National mortality data for England & Wales have been used to examine mortality by marital status.  Death rates for different age groups show that at each age group divorced men have higher rates than their married counterparts.  Divorced men in their forties and fifties, for example, have death rates double those of married men.  The death rate for divorced men in their 60s is about 70 per cent higher than for married men of the same age.  Single men under 50 have higher death rates than both married and divorced men, but similar rates to divorced men in the older age groups. 

The rates for divorced women are also higher in each age group than for married women, although the mortality differential is smaller—for example, divorced women in their 50s have a rate about 40 per cent higher than that of married women.  The death rate for divorced women in their 60s is about 33 per cent higher than for their married counterparts.  Single women have death rates that are higher than married women at every age.  Married women in their 30s, 40s and 50s have death rates half that of their single counterparts.1

In order to make an overall comparison of the relative health of married and divorced people, age standardised mortality rates by marital status have been calculated using England & Wales mortality data.2  This calculation takes account of possible differences in age structure between married and divorced populations.  Among relatively young men aged 65 and under (figure 21), the death rate for divorced men (80 per thousand) was 70 per cent higher than the death rate for married men (47 per thousand).  Among women the death rate of divorcees was 37 per cent higher than the rate of married women.  These results are consistent with the age-specific rates shown above.  So we see that men have higher mortality rates than women in general, and this difference is magnified by divorce.  Of particular interest is the fact that single women have death rates in the younger age groups that are twice those of married women.    

Divorce and unemployment

The General Household Survey is a continuous survey that is based on a sample of the general population resident in households in Great Britain.  The 1991 survey obtained information from 19 thousand people living in just under 10 thousand private households throughout the country.  It collected information on unemployment by marital status.  The data showed that divorced men have age-specific unemployment rates that are more than double those of married men.  For example, in the 35–44 age group, divorced men had a rate of unemployment that was three times higher than the rate among married men; 18 per cent among divorced men compared to 5 per cent among married men.  In the 45–54 age group, unemployment among divorced men was twice that of married men (14 per cent compared to 6 per cent respectively).  It is significant that there is no difference in unemployment rates between divorced and married women.3

Trends in sexual behaviour

The British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyle is the largest survey into sexual behaviour ever undertaken.  An expert team of epidemio­lo­gists designed and carried out the survey – funded by the Wellcome Trust – which collected information from a scientifically chosen sample of 19 thousand representatives of the British population in the age range 16 to 59.  Findings of the survey were reported in 1994 in the book Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.4

The survey provided strong evidence of major changes in sexual behaviour in the British population over the last four decades.  One of the most important changes was a sharp fall in the age of first sexual inter­course.  For example, among women the median age of first sexual intercourse has fallen from 21 years for those born in the early 1930s, to 17 years for those born in the early 1970s, showing a 4 year reduction in the median age over four decades.  Among men the median age of first intercourse declined from 20 years to 17 over the same period.5

Another measure of sexual activity was the proportion of people who were sexually active before their 16th birthday.  Data from the survey showed a large change over the last four decades.  Among women aged 55 and over (born in the 1930s) around 1 per cent had their first sexual intercourse before they were 16, compared to 19 per cent of women born in the 1970s, and teenagers at the time of the survey.  The authors commented that these changes in sexual behaviour ‘seem to have coincided with a period in which the traditional constraints on early sexual expression – social disapproval of sex before marriage, negative attitudes towards teenage sexuality and a fear of pregnancy – have been gradually lifted’.6

Another major trend was an increase in the number of sexual partners during the last four decades.  The survey found a steady increase in the proportion of people who reported 10 or more partners over a lifetime; an effect that was more marked for women than men.  Around 3 per cent of women, for example, who became sexually active in the 1950s reported 10 or more partners, compared to 10 per cent who became sexually active in the 1970s.7

Multiple sexual partners 

Not surprisingly, marital status has a great influence on sexual behaviour.  Divorced and separated men, in particular, are prone to multiple sexual partnerships.  Comparing men and women in the 25–44 age group, the survey shows that almost 40 per cent of divorced/separated men (including a small numbers of widowers) re­ported two or more partners in the last year, compared to 26 per cent of single men, 15 per cent of cohabiting men and 5 per cent of mar­ried men.  Among the females, 16 per cent of divorced/separated wo­men (including a small number of widows) reported two or more partners, a rate similar to that of single women (15 per cent), but much higher than married women (2 per cent).8

The difference in sexual behaviour between married and divorced men is further illustrated in figure 22, which shows the number of female sexual partners reported in the last five years.  Whereas 82 per cent of married men reported one sexual partner, almost a quarter of divorced men reported five or more partners, and just under 50 per cent report three or more partners in the last five years.  Among divorced women, 20 per cent reported 3 or more sexual partners in the last 5 years, compared to 3 per cent of married women.  However, one in six divorced women (17 per cent) reported no sexual partner in the last five years.9  According to the researchers, ‘The data presented here suggest that those who are separated, divorced and widowed may be a group with particularly rapid partner change.’10

An important aim of the national survey was to identify the population at higher risk of adverse outcomes from their sexual behaviour.  Accordingly, the survey defined risk-taking behaviour as those who had two or more partners in the last year, but did not use a condom in that time; they were considered to be practising ‘unsafe’ sex.  As expected, marital status had a strong effect.  By far the highest rates were reported by divorced/separated men, 17 per cent of whom had practised ‘unsafe’ sex in the last year, compared to 3 per cent of married men.  It is interesting to observe that cohabiting men (10 per cent) were three times as likely to report ‘unsafe’ sex in the last year than were married men.  The rate of ‘unsafe’ sex in the last year reported by single, divorced and cohabiting women were 11 per cent, 9 per cent and 6 per cent respectively.  Married women (1 per cent) had by far the lowest rate of ‘unsafe’ sex.11

Consistent with the reported rates of ‘unsafe’ sex, divorced women were more likely to have had a venereal infection than their married counterparts. The survey shows that 4 per cent of divorced women had attended a clinic for venereal disease in the last 5 years compared to 1 per cent of married women.  The figures for men are 6 per cent and 2 per cent respectively.12

A study by the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention in America has found that during the 1990s the number of over 50s who are infected with AIDS through heterosexual sex has doubled.  This increase is ex­plained by the newly divorced throwing themselves into new relationships, and infection rates are especially high among the retirement communities of Florida.  In response to this new threat the campaign for ‘safe’ sex has developed the slogan – ‘Sex is not only for the young.  Neither is AIDS.’13

Abortion by marital status

Divorced women are twice as likely as married women to have had an abortion.  The national survey shows that 22 per cent of divorced or separated women have had an abortion at some time during their lives, compared to 11 per cent of married women.  For the last five years the figures are 5 per cent and 3 per cent respectively.  It is interesting to note that the level of miscarriage in the last five years was virtually the same in married and divorced women (7 per cent and 6 per cent respectively).14

Comment

Divorce is associated with a significant increase in mortality, suggesting that it has a profound effect on both men and women.  The destructive behaviour associated with divorce is undoubtedly a factor that contributes to the higher death rates.  Some people are so disturbed by divorce that they lose their purpose in life, and some even the will to live.  The differential in death rates between divorced and married women is smaller than that observed in men.  This is probably due to the restraining effect of maternal responsi­bilities, which modify the self-destructive behaviour so apparent among men.  Married women have lower death rates than single women in each age group, showing that marriage has definite beneficial effects.  Feminists are wrong when they say that marriage is bad for women. 

The higher unemployment rate among divorced men is evidence of their lack of motivation and purpose—they lack the motivation to provide for the family of which they are no longer a part.  Women, however, face to face with the economic realities of providing for the children have little choice but to work in order to support themselves.

The evidence from the national survey of sexual behaviour shows that divorced people are far more likely to have multiple sexual partners, and to suffer the consequences of their unhealthy lifestyle.  As we have already seen, divorced men are prone to enter into cohabiting relationships, many of which are of short duration.  It is particularly sad for the children of divorce to see their parents behave in a way that they regard as immoral.  Moreover, the parents’ pattern of sexual behaviour sets an example their children are likely to emulate as they grow older.  Casual sexual relation­ships have consequences and often cause a feeling of frustration and regret.  It becomes rather pointless for mature men and women in their late 30s and 40s to be ‘playing the field’, moving from one sexual encounter to the next.  Many divorced people feel guilty because they sense that a lifestyle of uncommitted sex is wrong and sets a bad example for their children.  The high rate of abortion among divorced women is particularly sad, for it shows that although they have given themselves sexually, they have been unable to accept the pregnancy that results from the relationship.

Chapter 19.  Destructive associations

1.     Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Mortality statistics, General, 1993,1994 and 1995.  (Series DH1 no 28), London, HMSO, 1997.

2.     Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Mortality statistics, General. (Series DH1 no 27), London, HMSO, 1994.

3.     Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. General Household survey. 1991. Ann Bridgwood and David Savage. (OPCS Series GHS No. 22), London: HMSO, 1993, p103, table 5.19.

4.     Anne M. Johnson, Jane Wadsworth, Kaye Wellings and Julia Read. Sexual attitudes and lifestyle. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994.

5.     Kaye Wellings and Sally Bradshaw. ‘First Intercourse between Men and Women’ in Anne M. Johnson, et al. (eds.), Sexual attitudes and lifestyle. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994, chapter 4, p106.

6.     Ibid. p106.

7.     Anne Johnson and Jane Wadsworth. ‘Heterosexual Partnerships’, in Anne M. Johnson, et al. (eds.), Sexual attitudes and lifestyle. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994, chapter 5, p118.

8.     Ibid. p122.

9.     Anne Johnson, Sexual attitudes and lifestyle, Data from appendix 3, table A5.2A p444 & table A5.2B p446.

10.   Ibid. p123.

11.   Ibid. Data from appendix 3, table A10.2 p492 and p494.

12.   Ibid. Data from appendix 3, table A9.1 p482 and p480.

13.   Damian Whitworth. ‘Love is riskier the second time around’. The Times, 18 May 1999.

14.   Anne Johnson, Sexual attitudes and lifestyle, Data from appendix 3, table A9.2 p484.

[Home] [Abortion] [Cohabitation] [Divorce] [Marriage] [Sex education] [Contraception] [email to: belmonthouse1@aol.com]

Belmont House Publishing, 36 The Crescent, Belmont, Sutton, Surrey SM2 6BJ UK.  email: belmonthouse1@aol.com